Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2009 00:56:54 -0700
From: faber80
To: "lapack@cs.utk.edu" <lapack@cs.utk.edu>
Subject: [Lapack] Error in compiling Lapack 3.2

Hi, I've tried to compile the lapack package version 3.2 on my win-32 PC
using the Intel visual Fortran compiler V11 inside Visual Studio 2008,
but I've found the following errors:

zsyrfsx.f   Line 464 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK   (propably should be RWORK not to receive
the error)

zherfsx.f   Line 463 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK  (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zherfsx.f   Line 476 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK  (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zgerfsx.f   Line 498 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument RWORK (propably should be WORK not to receive the
error)

zgerfsx.f   Line 505 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument RWORK (propably should be WORK not to receive the
error)

csyrfsx.f   Line 464 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK   (propably should be WORK not to receive the
error)

cgbrfsx.f   Line 515 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument RWORK (propably should be WORK not to receive the
error)

cgbrfsx.f   Line 522 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument RWORK (propably should beRWORK not to receive the
error)

cposvxx.f   Line 520 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

cposvxx.f   Line 527 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zporfsx.f   Line 457 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK  (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zporfsx.f   Line 470 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK  (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

cherfsx.f   Line 463 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

cherfsx.f   Line 476 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK  (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

cporsfx.f   Line 457 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

csysvxx.f   Line 529 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

csysvxx.f   Line 538 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK  (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zhsevxx.f   Line 525 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zhsevxx.f   Line 534 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zsysvxx.f   Line 526 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK  (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zsysvxx.f   Line 535 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK  (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

zcposv.f    Line 214 The type of the actual argument differ from the type
of the dummy argument  WORK (propably should be RWORK not to receive the
error)

I've checked the errors and the variables type mismatch exists. Is this a
bug or must I activate some compiler option in order not to reach this
kind of errorrs?

Thank you