Editor's note:  These minutes have not been edited.


Minutes of the Frame Relay Service MIB Working Group June 24, June 
28, 1996
36th IETF, Montreal


I. RFC1604: Editor: David Fowler

The following issues about RFC1604 were discussed at the working 
group meeting. Some of the issues were raised on the mailing list.

1) Can we admit that this works for switches too? 
- Yes. This includes any changes required to allows R/W in the logical 
port table. Since the existing objects cannot be changed, the objects will 
be cloned. Maria Greene will post text to the list.

2) The description of frPVCEndptInDiscards description is not clear 
about whether bits discarded with DE are counter. 
- Congestion discards are not counted. Discards due to policing are the 
only ones counted.

3) There is no description of the values for frPVCRcvdSigStatus. In 
particular, deleted in unclear. 
- Andy Malis will send text to the mailing list describing deleted. 
Descriptions for all will be added to the document. 

4) frPVCConnectStatusChange trap is missing a varbind. For the PVC, 
there is the oper status of both directions, but only one RcvdSigStatus is 
included.
- A second instance of RcvdSigStatus will be added to the trap and the 
description will clarify that the first one is for the low end and the 
second is for the high end. 

5) The default for ifLinkUpDownTrapEnable is implementation 
specific. However, since the occurrences of the PVC trap are dependent 
on the frLport (i.e. no PVC traps are sent when the frLport goes down), 
the default for trap enable should be true for frLports
- change the mapping for frLports to put traps on and add a 
recommendation that the underlying physical layer be turned off, since 
both are not required.

6) The values for procedures are limited to network side and 
bidirectional. The related counters have descriptions that include 
references to user and network side procedures that are confusing.
- Clarify that bidirectional means that the frLport is using both user 
and network side procedures. User side counters are only valid for 
bidirectional, while network side counters are always valid. Replace 
noSuchName with noSuchInstance. 

7) When an underlying T1 goes to fail/test or the frLport goes to 
fail/test, the values for frPvcEndptRcvdSigStatus and 
frPVCConnect[h2l|l2h]Operstatus are unclear. 
- Make the following clarification: return a value of 'none' for 
frPvcEndptRcvdSigStatus if the "underlying" frLport is down (either 
due to LMI or DS1 failure) AND return the appropriate value for 
OperStatus (inactive if the DS1 or LMI failed, testing in the testing 
case). 

8) There is no easy way to find the next available DLCI. The NMS must 
getNext all the frPVCEndptTable entries for a frLport and find a free 
DLCI.
- Create an object like frPVCConnectIndexValue for DLCIs. 

9) Add a ifStackTable example.

10) Missing counters for PVCs
- Add InDiscardsDESet.
- Add In/OutBECN, In/OutFECN. In counters are only for NNI while 
Out counters are for NNI and DTE. Dave to post object text to list.

11) There are no names for PVCs.
- Add 2 new name: Service Provider Name (read/write, read/only 
minimum) and Service User Name (read/write). Dave to post object text 
to list.

12) Alternate PVC Configurations:
The current MIB does not allow an endpoint to have more than one 
configuration. Therefore, a user cannot more than one configuration for a 
pair of endpoints. For service level management, it is quite likely that 
there is different speeds for different times of the day, or for disaster 
recovery. 
- A new MIB module in a new document will be created. Dave will post 
the text to the list. The new MIB module will allow many combinations 
of cir/bc/be for PVCs. The last active combination will be stored in the 
frPVCEndptTable. 

II. Frame Relay/ATM Interworking:

The working group agreed that interworking will be restricted to the 
modeling of FRF.8 type connections. A previous attempt to model 
FR/ATM connections and James will post this to the list for information 
purposes.

Arian Yair has a proprietary implementation which he shared with 
the group. The table kept the FR endpoint always on one side and the 
ATM endpoint always on the other. A new separate connection table 
indexed by ifIndex (FR), DLCI, ifIndex(ATM), VPI, VCI will be created 
that contains the traffic descriptors and status values.

Point to multipoint connections were mentioned but no discussion 
resulted.

III. Accounting

The working group decided to use the framework created by the 
atommib working group. Billing parameters will be discussed on the 
mailing list. The existing accounting group in RFC1604 requires 
additional text to clarify it's purpose. 

IV. SVCs

An internet-draft was published by Don Cochrane that described an 
extension to the FR DTE MIB for SVCs and data compression. A 
presentation was given on his behalf by Adrian Orozco of Cabletron. 
Don has volunteered to edit the SVC MIB. It was noted that the 
proposal was similar to the atommib approach to SVCs. It was also 
decided that the interworking effort would not deal with SVCs at this 
time. SVCs will deal with the DTE side.

V. Misc.

The working group agreed to ask the area director for a charter change 
that would allow the group to deal with data compression and voice 
over frame relay. Both of these are largely DTE issues.