Editor's Note: Minutes received 12/14/92

CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_


Reported by Philip Almquist/Consultant

Minutes of the Selection Criteria BOF (SELECT)

The objective of the Selection Criteria BOF was to develop consensus on
a precise statement of the community's goals for a replacement for IP.
The goal was to provide a yardstick against which the various proposals
could be objectively measured to point up their relative strengths and
weaknesses.  Needless to say, this goal was far too ambitious to
actually be achievable in the single session available.

The BOF began with a discussion two previously written documents that
presented goals for the new IP:


   o draft-partridge-ipv7-criteria-00.txt (Partridge/Kastenholz)
   o draft-iab-ipversion7-00.txt (IAB)


The two sets of goals were compared and contrasted.  Craig Partridge and
Barry Leiner verbally clarified and presented additional rationale for
the goals presented in those papers.  Lively discussion ensued, during
which the Group modified the list of goals from the Partridge/Kastenholz
paper.

In particular, the goals of architectural simplicity and globally unique
identification of endpoints from the IAB's list were thought to be
important enough to be added.  Some participants pointed out that it was
also important to add topological flexibility as a goal, noting that we
certainly needed to understand whether any of the proposed next
generation IP's would preclude topologies currently in use.  Others
pointed out that, although it may be hard to quantify, the proposals may
embody differing amounts of technological risk, and that our criteria
needed therefore to address risk.  Some felt that performance needed to
be a goal.  Matt Mathis pointed out that different proposals may differ
in how the pain of deployment is allocated among the levels of the
networking food chain (backbones, midlevels, campus nets, end users),
and emphasized that we are unlikely to successfully deploy any proposal
in which some level receives little benefit from the new version of IP
yet is expected to shoulder a large chunk of the pain.  Finally, a
number of people felt that IETF change control and freely available
specifications have been critical to the success of the current IP, and
that it is therefore important to consider to what extent each of the
proposals preserves those features.  The goal of providing usage
accounting was dropped from the list of goals when it was pointed out
that the accounting requirements specified in the Partridge/Kastenholz
paper would be trivially met by any proposal.

Having come to a reasonable amount of consensus on a list of goals, the
BOF then set about the task of trying to rank them in terms of
importance.  No real consensus was attained.  Perhaps the best way to

                                   1





summarize the conclusions of this part of the meeting is to say that
whatever is chosen as an IP replacement must solve the scaling problem
and must not be substantially inferior to the current IP in terms of
other important attributes (security, manageability, robustness, etc.).

A third task, trying to refine each of the goals on the list into a
statement of sufficient detail and precision that the extent to which a
particular proposal met the goal could be fairly objectively determined,
was skipped due to lack of time.

Craig Partridge and Frank Kastenholz agreed to revise their
Internet-Draft to attempt to incorporate the results of the BOF.

Attendees

Roland Acra              acra@cisco.com
Philip Almquist          almquist@jessica.stanford.edu
Nagaraj Arunkumar        nak@3com.com
Randall Atkinson         atkinson@itd.nrl.navy.mil
Robert Austein           sra@epilogue.com
Tony Bates               t.bates@nosc.ja.net
Jordan Becker            becker@ans.net
Shiraz Bhanji            bhanji@gateway.mitre.org
Robert Braden            braden@isi.edu
Vickie Brown             brown@osi540sn.gsfc.nasa.gov
Jeffrey Burgan           jeff@nsipo.nasa.gov
Ross Callon              callon@bigfut.lkg.dec.com
Ken Carlberg             Carlberg@cseic.saic.com
Brian Carpenter          brian@dxcern.cern.ch
Charles Carvalho         charles@acc.com
Vinton Cerf              vcerf@cnri.reston.va.us
George Chang             gkc@ctt.bellcore.com
A. Lyman Chapin          lyman@bbn.com
Henry Clark              henryc@oar.net
Richard Colella          colella@osi.ncsl.nist.gov
David Crocker            dcrocker@mordor.stanford.edu
John Curran              jcurran@bbn.com
James Davin              davin@bellcore.com
Michael Davis            mad@spirit.clearpoint.com
Steve Deering            deering@parc.xerox.com
Richard desJardins       desjardi@boa.gsfc.nasa.gov
Tim Dixon                dixon@rare.nl
Kurt Dobbins             dobbins@ctron.com
Jacques Dugast           dugast@issy.cnet.fr
Donald Eastlake          dee@ranger.enet.dec.com
Robert Enger             enger@reston.ans.net
Roger Fajman             raf@cu.nih.gov
Dino Farinacci           dino@cisco.com
Dennis Ferguson          dennis@ans.net
William Fink             bill@wizard.gsfc.nasa.gov
Eric Fleischman          ericf@act.boeing.com
Peter Ford               peter@goshawk.lanl.gov
Shoji Fukutomi           fuku@furukawa.co.jp

                                   2





Vince Fuller             vaf@stanford.edu
Heather Gray             heather@zk3.dec.com
Eugene Hastings          hastings@psc.edu
Robert Hinden            hinden@eng.sun.com
Erik Huizer              huizer@surfnet.nl
Ole Jacobsen             ole@interop.com
David Jacobson           dnjake@vnet.ibm.com
Dan Jordt                danj@nwnet.net
Frank Kastenholz         kasten@ftp.com
Dave Katz                dkatz@cisco.com
Mark Knopper             mak@merit.edu
Stev Knowles             stev@ftp.com
John Larson              jlarson@parc.xerox.com
Barry Leiner             leiner@nsipo.nasa.gov
Fong-Ching Liaw          fong@eng.sun.com
Olli-Pekka Lintula       olli-pekka.lintula@ntc.nokia.com
Daniel Long              long@nic.near.net
Triet Lu                 triet@cseic.saic.com
Gary Malkin              gmalkin@xylogics.com
Tracy Mallory            tracym@3com.com
David Marlow             dmarlow@relay.nswc.navy.mil
Matt Mathis              mathis@a.psc.edu
David Meyer              meyer@oregon.uoregon.edu
Dennis Morris            morrisd@imo-uvax.disa.mil
John Moy                 jmoy@proteon.com
Andy Nicholson           droid@cray.com
Erik Nordmark            nordmark@eng.sun.com
Peder Norgaard           pcn@tbit.dk
Andrew Partan            asp@uunet.uu.net
Craig Partridge          craig@bbn.com
Roy Perry                rperry@advtech.uswest.com
Yakov Rekhter            yakov@watson.ibm.com
Joyce K. Reynolds        jkrey@isi.edu
Henry Sanders            henrysa@microsoft.com
John Scudder             jgs@merit.edu
Erik Sherk               sherk@sura.net
Cris Shuldiner           cws@ftp.com
William Simpson          Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
Lansing Sloan            ljsloan@llnl.gov
Frank Solensky           solensky@andr.ub.com
John Tavs                tavs@vnet.ibm.com
Marten Terpstra          marten@ripe.net
Richard Thomas           rjthomas@bnr.ca
Stuart Vance             vance@tgv.com
Warren Vik               wmv@i88.isc.com
Curtis Villamizar        curtis@ans.net
A. Lee Wade              wade@nsipo.nasa.gov
William Warner           warner@ohio.gov
James Watt               james@newbridge.com
Von Welch                vwelch@ncsa.uiuc.edu
Guy Wells                guy2@uswest.com
Chris Wheeler            cwheeler@cac.washington.edu
Linda Winkler            lwinkler@anl.gov
Robert Woodburn          woody@sparta.com

                                   3








4